A woman testifying in the ongoing trial of entertainer Russell Brand has characterized an alleged sexual assault against her as a violent and frantic encounter.

Brand, now 51 years old, is currently standing trial facing a total of seven criminal charges. These include three counts of rape, three charges of sexual assault, and a single charge of indecent assault. The allegations brought forward by six different women cover a ten-year timeframe from 1999 to 2009. He has maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings and entered pleas of not guilty to all allegations, asserting that any sexual interactions were entirely consensual.

During Tuesday's court session, the jury listened to testimony from the fourth complainant in the case. The woman alleges that the entertainer assaulted her during the mid-2000s inside the Choice FM radio studios located in central London. She recounted exiting a small room within the facility and encountering the defendant in the corridor.

According to her testimony, the interaction escalated immediately without warning. She described how he grabbed her face and pressed his body against her while initiating a rough and aggressive kiss. The witness told the court that the movement of his hands across her body and the intensity of the kiss prompted her to describe the event as frenzied and violent.

The woman explained that she eventually managed to push him away and directed profanity at him. She noted that several other individuals were accompanying the defendant at the time, none of whom intervened or commented on the incident. At the time of the alleged encounter, she had never met the defendant before, but she believed he was visiting the building for television commitments.

Reflecting on the aftermath, the witness stated that she experienced intense shock and felt degraded by what had occurred. She chose not to report the incident or discuss it with anyone for many years, explaining that the social climate at the time was vastly different regarding the disclosure of such behavior. When questioned by the defense regarding why she did not immediately approach law enforcement, she expressed fears that she would not be believed and worried about potential professional and financial repercussions.

The witness stated that she ultimately decided to come forward after viewing a television documentary examining the media personality and allegations concerning his conduct. The legal proceedings are continuing, with multiple complainants expected to give evidence over the course of the trial.

Reporting based on coverage first published by BBC News. Read the original report at BBC News.